tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22836912.post116456102228797612..comments2008-05-17T19:29:38.938-07:00kuldiphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02059333521665558972noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22836912.post-45105664929776238292008-05-17T19:29:00.000-07:002008-05-17T19:29:00.000-07:00It is sad that we come up with 'us vs them' attitude even while debating such important social issues. I would request you to be a bit more sensitive towards oppressed/backward communities and their needs. I am totally in favor of providing reservation to SC/ST/OBC as this seems the only way to somewhat reduce the huge gap created by centuries of oppression. Reservation is far from perfect method to this and have so many negative consequences but there doesn’t seem any other real feasible way in presentl situation. <BR/><BR/>As far as reservation for Muslims is concerned, I support it in principle. I dont understand how is it any different than reservation for SC/ST/OBC and even for women (none of them accept SCs are considered untouchables). But I do understand that in present scenario, without a broad consensus, providing reservation to Muslims would only do harm to society. It would be politicized by every party and would do more harm than benefit to the Muslim community. Having said that, government and society should help Muslims in all other possible ways e.g. by creating more and more minority institutes like AMU and by providing them with financial support for higher education.Aman Kumarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11199603326324903825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22836912.post-1170310283225220602007-01-31T22:11:00.000-08:002007-01-31T22:11:00.000-08:00i completely agree with u...the condition of muslims is indeed sad, but sypathy towards them would not solve the problem..the solution if any lies in educating them...raghavhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02628289496043325818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22836912.post-1169483220528659852007-01-22T08:27:00.000-08:002007-01-22T08:27:00.000-08:00Mr Owaisi in his speech does not respond to any of the issues and points raised by me.The condition of muslims in India is despicable ,is a fact. I do not dispute the same. My blog is about the selection of "Reservation" as a wrong remedy.kuldiphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02059333521665558972noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22836912.post-1166467070843098792006-12-18T10:37:00.000-08:002006-12-18T10:37:00.000-08:00Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen MP Asaduddin Owaisi on Sachar Committee Report In Parliament<BR/><BR/>ASADUDDIN OWAISI MP (HYDERABAD) : Thank you for giving me this opportunity. I rise to support the Bill that has been tabled in the august House. I have got some important points to bring to the notice of the august House.<BR/>The Sachar Committee report has been tabled in this House. It clearly states the educational backwardness of the Muslim community. According to Sachar Report, there are 39 per cent OBCs and 0.8 per cent Scheduled Caste in the Muslim community.<BR/>I support this Bill which provides reservation in Central Universities to SCs, STs and OBCs. However, I would like to know as to how fair it is to deny the benefits of reservation on the basis of religion, especially after the Government has tabled the Sachar Report in this august House which shows how bad my educational standards are and my conditions are.<BR/>I would just like to quote one point here as far as the report is concerned. Page 73 of Sachar Report clearly says, “The percentage of population of graduates, as far as the Muslims are concerned, is 1.2 and those attending P.G. courses is 16.3.” It is lesser in Muslims than in dalits also. You are not implementing these minority universities over there. But why is it that I am being denied such benefits? Moreover, the Presidential Order of 1950 contravenes the basic fundamental rights given in the Constitution.<BR/>How is it that only SCs belonging or professing the religion of Hinduism or Sikhism or neo Buddhism are being given reservation? Why not Dalit Christians and Dalit Muslims? This question has to be pondered over by the Government. I would request you sincerely, Sir, that the Government should come forward and ensure that the 1950 Presidential Order, Schedule III is amended. It says that only a person professing Hinduism or Sikhism or neo Buddhism can be classified as Schedule Caste. How is that possible? This Report of yours clearly says this. There is this argument about Muslims and OBCs. Why is it such a low percentage is there? This has to be looked into.<BR/>Lastly, about Jamia Milia University, how is that the present Vice-Chancellor wants to implement this present Bill in Jamia Milia University? Why has the Vice-Chancellor overnight changed this position? Why are we being denied such benefits? I would request you that this issue has to be taken care of. They have applied to the National Minority Education Commission also. It is pending over there. If Jamia Milia University is not a minority University, then, which is a minority university? This is a very important question. These are important points I wanted to bring to the notice of the august House.<BR/>I support this Bill. I hope that this UPA Government will take affirmative action and will not deny us reservation under Article 16(4). If people are opposed to reservations to Muslims, they should look into the pre-native history of Article 16(4). It is none other than Sardar Vallabhai Patel, who has stated `classes’ means `Minorities’. He was the Chairman of that Advisory Committee. Why are Muslims having reservations in Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka? Why can they not be given reservations nationwide? It has to be done. Literacy rate of 13 per cent of population is only 59. There is a huge difference between literate and educated persons. You can very well imagine 13 per cent of population with a literacy of 59 per cent. Hence, I would request that the Government should come forward with the proposal and I hope that the hon. Minister, when he stands up to reply would respond to this or this UPA Government has to amend 1950 Presidential Order. They have to take affirmative action under Articles 15(4) and 16(4).<BR/>Thank you.ALIhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11591479437541659739noreply@blogger.com